Disclaimer 2017-04-12T19:32:47+00:00

FDA Required Disclaimer For Sites That Do Not Endorse Chemotherapy:

This website is operated and controlled by an independent cancer research foundation and is intended for research purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for the diagnosis, treatment and advice of a qualified licensed professional. This site offers people medical information and tells them their alternative medical options, but in no way should anyone consider that this site represents the “practice of medicine.” This site assumes no responsibility for how this material is used. Also note that this website frequently updates its contents, due to a variety of reasons, therefore, some information may be out of date. The statements regarding alternative treatments for cancer have not been evaluated by the FDA.We have put cancer treatments being researched on this website because we, at the The Sentient Temple feel a need for new and better alternative cancer treatments and we feel a moral obligation to let all cancer patients be aware of ALL of their cancer treatment OPTIONS.

Before putting a treatment under research on this website, the treatment is proven to be absolutely safe (i.e. we have tested its safety on ourselves). Furthermore, based on a combination of anecdotal evidence, scientific evidence and/or cancer theory, which we consider to be relevant; we strongly believe that the research cancer treatments on this website will provide significant benefits to any cancer patient who uses these treatments as directed. These judgments are based on the many years of collective experience of the board members of The Sentient Temple helping cancer patients.

The cancer treatments on this website should NOT be used by advanced cancer patients. It is not that these treatment are dangerous, they certainly are NOT dangerous, but it is because they are still being researched as effective cancer treatments (i.e. they are perfectly safe, but their effectiveness has not yet been evaluated).

Some people are concerned that some of those involved with cancer research are not medical doctors or PhDs in medicinal chemistry. We feel that God knows how to cure cancer and that God is billions of times smarter than all medical doctors and PhDs combined. We feel God has put hundreds of substances and methods of curing cancer on this earth for the benefit of His children. We thus feel that spending many years of our life learning how the pharmaceutical industry treats all diseases as chronic diseases is not a wise use of our time and that it is a far more effective use of our time to research the things God has put on this earth which we feel can cure almost all cancer cases, especially if they are used as soon as the diagnoses of cancer is made.

Due to FDA regulations, we cannot legally proactively seek cancer patients to volunteer to use any of these cancer treatments, however, if a cancer patient does CHOOSE to use one or more of these treatments, we will be happy to work with the cancer patient and/or their caregiver.

Our email address is at the bottom of each treatment article, but it must be understood by the cancer patient or their caregiver that we cannot legally make any medical claims for the effectiveness of any of these treatments, we can only provide public information provided to us by patients who have previously used these treatments, if any.

In some states and some countries, children under the age of majority are legally considered to be under the care of their government (whether state or federal) and they (the parents or legal guardians) do not have a choice as to which cancer treatment(s) they are allowed to use for their minor children. We do not have the funding to be aware of all laws in all states and all federal jurisdictions; and as such we leave it up to the parents or other legal guardians to be responsible that they provide only legal cancer treatments for their minor children.

A Discussion Of The Use of the Term “Cure”

People get cancer when there is an imbalance between the number of cancer cells in their body and the strength of their immune system. A person “gets cancer” when that balance is destroyed either by the formation of too many cancer cells or the weakening of their immune system.

The attempt of alternative medicine is to restore this balance. When the balance is restored, the person is “cured” of their cancer because they have a strong enough immune system to handle the number of cancer cells in their body.

Orthodox medicine does not like people using the word “cure.” The reason is that orthodox cancer treatments destroy a person’s immune system and thus the patient can never restore the balance between the number of their cancer cells and the strength of their immune system.

The definition of “cure” that orthodox medicine uses is that the patient lives 5 years after diagnosis; even if they have no immune system, no matter what their physical condition, no matter how many cancer cells they have, and no matter how long they are expected to live after the 5 year mark. Their definition is designed to glorify treatments that convert cancer into a chronic disease (i.e. the patient has no immune system). Increasing the percentage of patients who live for 5 years is more of a reflection of their profit motives than the effectiveness of their treatments.

Alternative cancer treatments can actually have one of three different outcomes:

First, are those who never get cancer again because their cancer cells have been killed, or reverted into normal cells, and their immune system has been built up and their lifestyle has changed.

Second, are those who have the vast majority of their cancer cells killed or reverted into normal cells, but for one of many different reasons, such as going back to their old lifestyle, the cancer does return. In this case, there is a high probability that they will know what to do the second time around.

Third, are those who do not survive their cancer. This can happen because the wrong treatment was chosen or prior orthodox cancer treatments did irreversible damage. In any case, it is almost certain that the alternative cancer treatments improved and extended their life far beyond what orthodox medicine could have done.

Orthodox medicine has had many opportunities to establish treatments that cured cancer (using the alternative medicine definition of “cure”). In every case they have rejected such treatments in favor of far more profitable treatments. In fact, the choice of orthodox medicine for their definition of “cure” is designed to hide the fact that they have no desire to actually “cure” a cancer patient using the alternative definition of cure.

The goal of orthodox medicine is to convert a cancer patient into a long-term profit center (i.e. they wish to turn cancer into a chronic disease), such as they already do with diabetes patients. Their definition of “cure” reflects this desire and their desire to “look good” to the public. Orthodox medicine frequently uses clever definitions to hide their real goals and the ineffectiveness of their treatments.